RateCity.com.au
  1. Home
  2. Home Loans
  3. News
  4. Property spruiker's courses ruled an expensive waste of time'

Property spruiker's courses ruled an expensive waste of time'

Nick Bendel avatar
Nick Bendel
- 3 min read
article cover image

Australia’s consumer watchdog has scored a legal victory against a property spruiker who made false claims about real estate investment.

The Federal Court has found that We Buy Houses and its sole director, Rick Otton, “made false or misleading representations in promoting a number of wealth creation strategies involving real estate”, according to the ACCC, which initiated the legal action.

The court found that We Buy Houses did not have a reasonable basis for representing that, by following its strategies, consumers could:

  • Buy a house for $1, without needing a deposit, bank loan or real estate experience, or using little or none of their own money
  • Create passive income streams through property and quit their jobs
  • Build a property portfolio without their own money invested, new bank loans or any real estate experience
  • Start making profits immediately and create or generate wealth

False claims, false testimonials

We Buy Houses failed to sufficiently inform consumers that its strategies could only realistically be successfully implemented by a consumer who already owned real estate, or who was able to finance a bank loan, according to the ACCC.

“The court also found that Mr Otton had made false or misleading representations that he had successfully implemented the wealth creation strategies he taught,” it said.

“In addition, a book authored by Mr Otton, and websites operated by We Buy Houses and Mr Otton, included testimonials from ‘students’ claiming they were able to buy a house for $1 which the court found were false or misleading.”

istock_79305201_small5

We Buy Houses raked in millions of dollars

ACCC deputy chair Delia Rickard said We Buy Houses “sold a lie to vulnerable consumers” that home ownership could be achieved easily through strategies taught by Mr Otton.

“Around 2,000 consumers spent around $3,000 per ticket to attend Mr Otton’s boot camps, and approximately 700 consumers participated in the mentoring program at a cost of up to $26,000,” she said.

“Consumers who attended We Buy Houses seminars, boot camps and mentoring should be aware that, in her judgment, Justice Gleeson stated that for ordinary consumers seeking to achieve the outcomes represented by We Buy Houses and Mr Otton, the free seminars were a waste of time, and that the boot camps and the mentoring programs were an expensive waste of time.”

Justice Gleeson described Mr Otton as “a very unreliable witness who was prepared to maintain or defend statements that were obviously untrue or misleading”.

ACCC preparing further legal action

The ACCC instituted proceedings against We Buy Houses and Mr Otton in March 2015 following a coordinated investigation with NSW Fair Trading.

The ACCC alleged breaches of the Australian Consumer Law and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001. The Federal Court concluded that the conduct was within the ambit of the ACL, not the ASIC Act.

The ACCC will now prepare the matter for a hearing seeking relief against both We Buy Houses and Mr Otton, including penalties, and a disqualification order against Mr Otton.

Disclaimer

This article is over two years old, last updated on August 14, 2017. While RateCity makes best efforts to update every important article regularly, the information in this piece may not be as relevant as it once was. Alternatively, please consider checking recent home loans articles.

Compare home loans in Australia

Product database updated 15 Nov, 2024

Share this page

Get updates on the latest financial news and products

By continuing, you agree to the RateCity Privacy Policy, Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

Latest home loans news